FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
As some of you are aware, I am building my first project. This has probably been asked before. I plan on building a mild 400/4speed. What are the advantages of headers vs manifolds. Will the R/A manifolds flow equivalent to headers? What headers are "good" and what will fit a 66 gto? I also don't want to deal with the "tick tick tick" noise associated with headers. I am not building a race car, but want to get all that I can get out of the car. Also what exhaust system do you all recommend?
As always thanks for replies. Josh
__________________
Can't never did a damn thing..... Impossible is only temporary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
As some of you are aware, I am building my first project. This has probably been asked before. I plan on building a mild 400/4speed. What are the advantages of headers vs manifolds. Will the R/A manifolds flow equivalent to headers? What headers are "good" and what will fit a 66 gto? I also don't want to deal with the "tick tick tick" noise associated with headers. I am not building a race car, but want to get all that I can get out of the car. Also what exhaust system do you all recommend?
As always thanks for replies. Josh
__________________
Can't never did a damn thing..... Impossible is only temporary |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
frittering and wasting the hours in an off hand way.... 1969 GTO, 455ci, 230/236 Pontiac Dude's "Butcher Special" Comp hyd roller cam with Crower HIPPO solid roller lifters, Q-jet, Edelbrock P4B-QJ, Doug's headers, ported 6X-8 (97cc) heads, TKO600, 3.73 geared Eaton Tru-Trac 8.5", hydroboost, rear disc brakes......and my greatest mechanical feat....a new heater core. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
David is right. The more info you can provide, the more advice you'll get back - for better or for worse .
http://kurtspontiac.homestead.com/TimSimpson66GTO.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry bout that guys, guess i wasn't thinking completely. What I am putting together is a 68 WT 400 w/16 heads. Motor is being bored 30 over. The heads are being ported to flow better unsure of the flow numbers. My major toss up is the cam choice. I am thinking of putting an 068 cam in, but I like a lopey idle so I was told about the 455? cam. The cam is my major hang up right now. The carb is gonna be the original carb, quad 4 barrel. I think that I am going to try to get as close to 10:1 as possible. Don't want to go under 9.5:1. As of right now there is nothing radical going on, but I am easily swayed to the dark side. Hope this helps.
__________________
Can't never did a damn thing..... Impossible is only temporary |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
How often are you going to drive the car? and how often are you planning on going to the track to race? Finally, how fast do you want to go?
__________________
--------------------------- Fool Around, Get Hurt, Don't come Crying to me. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Chris,
I don't intend to race the car. But I am also not going to be nice to it either. I want to be able to drive it as often as possible, nice days, cruise nights etc. As far as fast, just like everybody I want to be strong and get down the road as quickly as I can.
__________________
Can't never did a damn thing..... Impossible is only temporary |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
i'm not the most knowledgeable poncho guy on here but i can tell you from my personal experiences and experiments on my pontiac powered 32 ford...the best system i found was using 4 tube headers,2 chamber flow masters,and 2 1/2" exhaust pipe.my engine liked this set up very well! and thats my 2 cents.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I believe a 2 1/2" exhaust system with the mufflers of your choice will do the job. Based on your situation, I would lean toward the RA manifolds instead of the headers because of the long term maintenance issues of a commonly driven street car.
--------------------------- Fool around, Get hurt, don't come crying to me.
__________________
--------------------------- Fool Around, Get Hurt, Don't come Crying to me. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
frittering and wasting the hours in an off hand way.... 1969 GTO, 455ci, 230/236 Pontiac Dude's "Butcher Special" Comp hyd roller cam with Crower HIPPO solid roller lifters, Q-jet, Edelbrock P4B-QJ, Doug's headers, ported 6X-8 (97cc) heads, TKO600, 3.73 geared Eaton Tru-Trac 8.5", hydroboost, rear disc brakes......and my greatest mechanical feat....a new heater core. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Ditto the above, RA manifolds and 2 1/2" pipes. However, I am concerned about your optimism w/r/t your compression ratio. If you really want to drive it on the street a lot, I would keep it below 9.5:1. If it were my car I would be shooting for closer to 9.0:1 to 9.25:1. Of course I can only get 91 Octane.
http://www.jimspontiac.homestead.com/Index.html |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
OMT,
I am sure this isn't the area for this question but I figured I would ask it here anyway. Why do you feel that 9.5:1 is too high? ( not being smart, I am trying to learn) I know of some SBC's in the area that are running 10:1. Is my pontiac engine not capable of running 10:1 or even 9.5:1 on pump gas? like I said before this is my first pontiac build up so I am trying to absorb as much info as I can. We can get 93 octane here, so would that make it easier to get 9.5 :1 without detonation?
__________________
Can't never did a damn thing..... Impossible is only temporary |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Go with the Manifolds. Headers can be a hassle unless you invest in a real good set like Indian Adventures or Doug's Headers.
Axle, You got any pics of your rod? I'm thinking of starting a rod project. I plan on buying a piece here and there over the next several years for a traditional "no billet" rod. http://home.earthlink.net/~uptons1/
__________________
_________________________ _________________________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qZgOpn-w-o <<< Burnout Video ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Treat Me Good, I'll Treat You Better; Treat Me Bad, I'll Treat You Worse" Sonny Barger ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I hope you can continue to get 93 octane, but I wouldn't bet on it. You won’t lose all that much power by dropping a half point in compression. I would personally prefer to be able to set the distributor curve to what the engine would really like rather than having to tune around a potential detonation problem. Our engines like a lot of advance early in the curve. My streetcar has 9.6:1 with a very large cam, which means less low RPM cylinder pressure. It will still rattle on bad days, i.e., when it is running.
http://www.jimspontiac.homestead.com/Index.html |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Nozzle,
I just took my 72 to the track for the first time Saturday. Car went 7.95 @ 88mph (1/8 mile). The car has Ram Air manifolds and 2 1/2 inch exhaust, and Q-jet carb. The manifolds should work fine. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for all the replies. I think that I am going to go with the R/A manifolds. OMT, thanks for the insight to my C/R scenario. I am going to rethink my build up. One again, thanks.
Josh
__________________
Can't never did a damn thing..... Impossible is only temporary |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
I just caught something that I don't think anyone else noticed. If you are running 16 heads that motor will probably have quite a bit more than 10:1. 16s are a very high compression head.
Give me a thumbs up, tell me "Nice Car!", but for god's sake, don't call it an Impala. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Typically a 400 with #16 heads will have a true compression ratio of around 10.25:1. It is very hard to get it down to 9.5:1 without using dished pistons. I got mine down to 9.6:1 by using RAIV valves and a thick head gasket. I also do not mill the heads or the block surface any more than is necessary to get them flat.
http://www.jimspontiac.homestead.com/Index.html |
Reply |
|
|