Quote:
Originally Posted by Vengeance Race Engines
A profile more suited to the application and rpm range. In YOUR engine, with 9.5 compreasion and those lobes, that 112 is hurting you. With Edelbrock heads , a single pane and 10.5 compression, it would be a different conversation. That cam wants to shine up top, and can't due to heads and intake, so torque drops like a stone. If 5500 rpm is what you were after, a profile more suited to work there would have yielded better results. Not knocking what you have. Just an observation.
|
Thanks for your input. I have run the HO Racing HC-03 (244/252) in the original 400 iteration and did find that it really woke it up from the original 041 cam. I assumed this cam would be analogous to what I have already run