View Single Post
  #27  
Old 04-12-2024, 10:05 AM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,445
Default

" Dave was somewhat unhappy with the results he said it could of been much better is the foundry did a better job of following his design."

I can understand why he might of been disappointed. The port work and plenum work on a production as cast Tomahawk intake is nowhere near my Dave Bisschop modified HSD intake. Example, as mentioned the as cast port exit dimensions were reduced to work on a stock iron intake. That and a difference in the runners. Also one runner as cast is particularly quirky, with different widths, its been quite awhile and I can't remember which one. Others have brought that subject up before.

All this said I can personally say it took quite a bit of work to make my as cast Tomahawk intake to come close my Dave Bisschop modified HSD intake. But after the work both produced similar results on my limited dyno testing.


Also note there have been some slight design changes over the years on the Tomahawk intake depending on the source (and foundry ?)
Note Skips comment in his post above regarding the EFI bosses.

Edit: Post from Skip Fix in 2006 regarding his Tomahawk intake runners....
As in another post the #1 and #2, particularly #1, runners/entrance is much narrower than the rest of the runners, some by almost .250".





.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE

Last edited by Steve C.; 04-12-2024 at 10:53 AM.