View Single Post
  #78  
Old 01-21-2024, 01:01 AM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

As long as we’re giving examples of 2802 cam car combinations, here’s one. With the Crower 60919 cam, 67 GTO weighs 3600+… 461 with a Q’jet.. performer rpm intake. Turbo 400 trans, 3.73 gear… pump gas. Closed exhaust. Ran 11.60 at Norwalk there’s a video of it on this site. If you take the weight and mph it works out to 500 hp. The kicker is, no roll bar, so to keep it from going faster then 11.60’s he actually put a block of wood under the gas pedal. Perfectly street able.

So just showing Z the potential his combo has with Crower cam. Thats what at least I thought thats what he’s asking. ( Different cam ? Chain ? Should be Faster ) then with 2802….answer definitely. Dose he have some things to address sure, but he’s pulling motor because of oil pan leak. Now knows he has to degree the new cam in, and should definitely take a compression test before pulling the motor. Even if everything it correct with 2802 cam it definitely will run faster with the Crower 60916. It’s pretty obvious he’s not happy with the performance. There’s no way in hell 2802 cam will make same power as the Crower 60916.

For me anyway to keep beaten to death how well 2802 performs, is just crazy. I just don’t get it. Even if there’s issue and those issues are corrected ain’t gonna happen. So while its down why not go with the Crower, thats up to him to decide. Just me 2 cents.

__________________

Last edited by Gach; 01-21-2024 at 01:07 AM.