FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1972 TA on BaT
Nice looking 72 TA on BaT: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...c-firebird-12/
As what seems to be the norm these days, there are several issues with the car (water temp gauge, RTS dash insert, rear spoiler end caps (one correct, one not), no sign of ever having A/C, etc.), but what I noticed was the block VIN stamp. The stamping starts with "X2N" and I was expecting "22N". Is X2N a known stamping for 72's? John
__________________
70 TA RAIII M20 05D 70 TA RAIII M20 06B |
The Following User Says Thank You to 70TA-RAIII For This Useful Post: | ||
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Nice looking car. Does the drivers rear quarter look funny to you? In pic # 61 the line coming off the wheel flare going back looks wrong to me.
__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Blue interior car originally, full AC removal. Interesting to see where this one shakes out $
__________________
"Spend all your time and money on that Pontiac GTO pile" - The Go-Gos, 1981 |
The Following User Says Thank You to starlightblack For This Useful Post: | ||
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Love the color combo, highly doubt it began life as a M22 car...
6 areas of interest on this one... several of those points have been mentioned before. 1) factory AC charged on invoice copy, yet body build w no AC.... those of us that have been around a long time know of some very collectible 64-65 GTO's & later Dport RA GTO's that had factory AC added by owners. Fairly common in the mid to late 80's & know I'm not not the only vendor that provided AC system changeovers. On all of those legal swaps, the conversions were done by cutting out the face of the original cowl, along with bodywork.. Similar deals have been performed on numerous factory AC cars that an owner modified the face of the cowl to accept a factory heater setup. Where's this lead on any highly collectible auction car = Disclosue. What's going on should be noted, otherwise, the outer box needs to be removed & conf VIN noted. 2) VIN to body number span... 2N505476 fits in the 09D Norwood body build range, not 01B as noted on the auction cars trim tag. Why such a deal, read further. look closer at the pic of the trim tag, then look at the pic of several original '72 Firebird trim tags, easy to spot what's going on... 3) stamping of partial vin on the block, nuff said... 4) engine assembly number of ( 228159 does not fit for an early to late Fall of 71 WM engine build. 5) interestingly, the invoice copy notes ZS1 17-1535 & 9D at the bottom of the option lists. also notes a 5 PCT car, this coincides with the 1/31/1972 ship date. Def some form of "Brasshat". 6) prev auction listings of near a decade ago noted this N505xxx T/A as a project with some concern.
__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms. Last edited by 'ol Pinion head; 01-03-2023 at 01:36 PM. |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to 'ol Pinion head For This Useful Post: | ||
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Bought to flip, and flippers are bidding ...
Its probably a very nice driver. The 5 speed most likely caused a large opening in the tunnel if not a very recent version modified for an F body. Since it is on BAT, the price on a car like this might see dollars more than its worth. Subjectivity will sell it. These items are paint color, 5 speed ( love to see the install) , and interior condition. Flippers don't care about originality typically , which in this case is fine, its a #3 driver and should be driven, not stored away. I'm guessing 85k, and if it was white, 77k..
__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulabruce For This Useful Post: | ||
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In one sense that's okay if the bidders realize what they're bidding on. And perhaps the seller doesn't know these cars like we do to know things don't jive. But I feel sorry for anyone who may win this car thinking they're getting some thing that it simply isn't.
__________________
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Came with a Unit Distributor, looks like it has a points distributor now.
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I agree. The contour of the body line is not sharp enough. Had the same issue on my ‘78 when new lowers were put on. I’m guessing at least that side had work done…
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know ANY personal history on this particular car.
Many historical type things are already obvious, as noted by others, and they are right about those things. Just want to add some clarity about the Invoice disproving the trim tag. 1. It was a Zone Brass car in Florida (FL license charge) 2. They used cars for 3 months or 3000 miles whichever came first (general rule of protocol). 3. How does a car body get jigged up , built , delivered to a Florida Zone Office and used for 3 months or 3000 miles , then resold to a dealer -- all in a 2 week period ? The answer - it never happened - not even on Star Trek. Best educated guess is they had to have a repop trim tag made for the car , and used a general rule of thumb of 2-3 weeks before the Shipping Date on Invoice. But ,,, they didn't understand this Invoice and it shows out loud. This vehicle had previous engagement before going to Coggin Pontiac Just backing up the data that oPh provided. Its concrete info Repop trim tag - not a death toll , but bad dating hurts A LOT. Toss in the goofy VIN stamp on block , the ReStamped CARTER carb , probable rebody with Non-AC shell ,,,, car feels extremely dirty . But it looks clean ,,, especially for a Florida car If someone buys it without connecting the dots beforehand, they will be a broken man when the dots do connect later. Someone fkkd up everything they were trying to cover up. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Baron Von Zeppelin For This Useful Post: | ||
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Who else thinks the missing AC just slipped through the cracks on the invoice billing ?
We have seen adjusted invoices for missing components before. Usually it is lesser pertinent type things. AC is a major expense and hard to not notice - especially in Florida. That would mean the Florida Brass never realized it was hot, forgot he ordered AC, and never fulfilled his duty to alert PMD about it. And then Coggin Pontiac never noticed it, or just said no big deal and just paid PMD for the AC anyway. That would have DEFINITELY been caught and corrected on the Invoice of this car. Let there be No Doubt About It. That was tall coin back then. These invoices were the billings sent to the dealers for cars they purchased from PMD. Cars were not free or just scattered across dealership lots. Dealers selected the cars and paid PMD for them. Regardless if for stock inventory or customer order. The dealer paid PMD , the buyer paid the Dealership. 101 |
The Following User Says Thank You to Baron Von Zeppelin For This Useful Post: | ||
#11
|
|||
|
|||
BVZ, you can rest assure Coggin Pontiac was billed, & paid for an AC system that blew nice & cold on that particular '72 T/A after GM zone brass hat service, and for final sale nearly 4 months after leaving Norwood Assembly.
Whoever bought this project in the mid 00's, & shipped it west & then performed the initial "restoration" near 35 years after it was originally assembled would be the one(s) you would need to pin down on the non AC attributes of the car as so "restored".
__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 'ol Pinion head For This Useful Post: | ||
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Some of the things that guys post on BaT gets really weird and bent.
I don't check many of their auctions unless they involve a Pontiac and get posted on here somewhere. But it never fails to bring out some entertaining dialogues. I might join that group someday and spectate more often. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Baron Von Zeppelin For This Useful Post: | ||
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, the banter is all over the map...entertaining to watch
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Most people who have been on this forum for a while know about the term multi-invoice car.
This car would have been one. A previous invoice billing the car to that Florida Zone Office. ZSI is for Zone Stock/Inventory The discount tells it pulled a duty The Florida License charge tells it was registered for use. They are not always still on file with PHS , but it would be worth checking with them if someone were interested enough in pursuing the car at a certain price point. PHS doesn't always automatically scan for that possibility. Most times you will have to point out the reason for suspecting multi invoices and Jim will see your point - and investigate. If it is still on file , it will predate the trim tag by a wide margin. fwiw It would be the first small step of putting this car back in proper order by at least getting the trim tag to coincide with the VIN range. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Baron Von Zeppelin For This Useful Post: | ||
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Like it tapers back too soon creating a larger curve than typical?
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But it looks like maybe a bad repair? Compare to the next pic #62
__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jhein For This Useful Post: | ||
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a No Reserve auction for the Blue 72 ?
Or do all the No Reserve auctions on BaT specify No Reserve in their titles ? Noticed a couple listings had it listed in their titles. I didnt see anything on this auction stating there was a reserve , or reserve not met , unless that is just a given fact on BaT. Rocky did a pretty good job of balancing while walking on the egg shells in his last couple of comments on there. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, I believe all auctions are with a reserve unless stated as "no reserve".
John
__________________
70 TA RAIII M20 05D 70 TA RAIII M20 06B |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for clarifying about a reserve on it.
He probably will eventually have to take a bath to ever sell it now. Seems to be a small scale flipper and non-pontiac guy who got his feet too wet, and fell in over his head. It will likely just keep doing the rinse/repeat cycle over and over between dealers and flippers who don't perform due diligence. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Just saw this.
I see we're all in agreement. Unfortunately, lots of questionable areas on this car. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Rocky Rotella For This Useful Post: | ||
Reply |
|
|