Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-14-2008, 06:20 AM
Norwood's Avatar
Norwood Norwood is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 6,660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Father&Son73T/A View Post
I thought the hose for a 73 was 481776,not 489876 shown on your pics?
Am I wrong?,were both used?
I bought ones from Ames for the 73,.....481776 but with white markings very similar to the yellow marked one you show,it looks correct but not exactly like yours.


481776 is the part# that my GM parts book lists as all 71-75 f body. My book is dated 1978 so it could have changed sometime in that time. I also think that the 481776 is still avalible from GM.


I also show that the 480200 is still a good part#

  #22  
Old 07-14-2008, 07:36 PM
Father&Son73T/A Father&Son73T/A is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,424
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwood View Post
481776 is the part# that my GM parts book lists as all 71-75 f body. My book is dated 1978 so it could have changed sometime in that time. I also think that the 481776 is still avalible from GM.


I also show that the 480200 is still a good part#
418776 was dicontinued by GM in 2002.
The pic of the 73 SD has a hose #489876,which is actually the hose on my 79 and is correct for a 79 W72,I confirmed this.
That's why I am curiouse about the 489876 on a 73 SD..........

..........from what I understand 480200 IS STILL AVAILABLE from GM,,,,,

__________________
1973 T/A Buccaneer Red L-75 A3,83k mi. #'s match
1979 T/A Atlantis Blue W-72 WS6 23k mi.survivor#'s match
1999 T/A Navy Blue 60k mi....babied
1968 442-gone but not forgotten
"Oh,you can think about it,.....but don't do it!"
Sheriff Bufford T.Justice
  #23  
Old 07-14-2008, 08:35 PM
Norwood's Avatar
Norwood Norwood is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 6,660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Father&Son73T/A View Post
418776 was dicontinued by GM in 2002.


..........from what I understand 480200 IS STILL AVAILABLE from GM,,,,,
But what about 481776? If it was discontiued in 2002 somebody should tell GM parts Direct because they still show it. I have found there listing to be very accurate. Could they be 6 years behind?


GM PART # 480200
CATEGORY: Radiator Hose Lower
PACK QTY: 1
CORE CHARGE: $0.00
GM LIST: $37.12
OUR PRICE: $19.28


GM PART # 481776
CATEGORY: Radiator Hose Upper
PACK QTY: 1
CORE CHARGE: $0.00
GM LIST: $44.73
OUR PRICE: $23.26

  #24  
Old 07-14-2008, 09:02 PM
Father&Son73T/A Father&Son73T/A is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,424
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwood View Post
But what about 481776? If it was discontiued in 2002 somebody should tell GM parts Direct because they still show it. I have found there listing to be very accurate. Could they be 6 years behind?


GM PART # 480200
CATEGORY: Radiator Hose Lower
PACK QTY: 1
CORE CHARGE: $0.00
GM LIST: $37.12
OUR PRICE: $19.28


GM PART # 481776
CATEGORY: Radiator Hose Upper
PACK QTY: 1
CORE CHARGE: $0.00
GM LIST: $44.73
OUR PRICE: $23.26

Well,we know GM has been a bunch of bone heads lately not listening to their loyal few left don't we?...........IE no F'n TA in 09,just Craparo
I called Marquardt Pontiac and Jenning Chevrolet....yeah i know,but they "did" carry Pontiac parts,and they told me first yeah,it's available,then a pause.......uh..sorry,it was discontinued
YO told me they were dicontinued in 02.


HOWEVER...........I was told by an unnamed sourcethat 418776 is the replace ment number to 489876.................
....however you have to cut off the #418776 when putting it on...

..... THE PLOT THICKENS

__________________
1973 T/A Buccaneer Red L-75 A3,83k mi. #'s match
1979 T/A Atlantis Blue W-72 WS6 23k mi.survivor#'s match
1999 T/A Navy Blue 60k mi....babied
1968 442-gone but not forgotten
"Oh,you can think about it,.....but don't do it!"
Sheriff Bufford T.Justice
  #25  
Old 07-14-2008, 09:34 PM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

Fatherandson, regarding the '73SD, it's an 18K mile car, very correct, and no reason to believe it's not an original hose. I specifically questioned the owner about the hose as I then used it as a go-by for the Brewster car.

Here's a GM 481776 hose. It is longer on the radiator side, but can be cut and still retain the stamp. The GM lettering is not the same as 'back in the day'. I quickly stamped a 489867 on it for comparison sake.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	489867 compare 481776.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	77.2 KB
ID:	136404  


Last edited by 165th; 07-14-2008 at 09:43 PM.
  #26  
Old 07-14-2008, 09:34 PM
Norwood's Avatar
Norwood Norwood is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 6,660
Default

HOWEVER...........I was told by an unnamed sourcethat 418776 is the replace ment number to 489876.................
....however you have to cut off the #418776 when putting it on...


If that number changed, it changed before 1978 because that is the date of my parts book. As I said earlier the 418776 is listed for ALL F from 71 to 75. My book ends with the 75 model year

  #27  
Old 07-14-2008, 10:20 PM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

This may be really oversimplifying things, and of course, it's based the data collected for, well, two days and 3 cars, haha, but it appears there are 3 generations of 489867:

1. '73 thereabouts, like the one I made the stamp of, yellow lettering.
2. '77 thereabouts, with RADIATOR spelled out, but the arrow shorter and the triangle moved, white lettering.
3. '79 thereabouts, with RAD and arrow longer again.

And, it seems it would be easy enough to verify the correct part no. for early cars to see some 418776 on original cars.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	radiator stamp low mile sd s.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	108.9 KB
ID:	136412   Click image for larger version

Name:	77 vintage 489867.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	238.0 KB
ID:	136413   Click image for larger version

Name:	origw72radhose007xn1.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	45.3 KB
ID:	136415  


Last edited by 165th; 07-14-2008 at 10:38 PM.
  #28  
Old 07-14-2008, 10:38 PM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

I forgot I had this picture. Here is the top radiator hose from a Scott Tieman restored '73SD Formula. This car has been seen on calendars and Hemmings Muscle etc. It appears to be a NOS hose he used on the restoration, or possibly the original hose.

This picture and the Red '73SD TA were taken at the 2006 TA Nat's. Scott had just finished the car.

I was having a little fun with the 3rd pic. How often can you get a pic of a Brewster Green SD Formula in the dog dish of a Florentine Red SD Formula?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Tieman 73 SD Formula 2.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	112.1 KB
ID:	136423   Click image for larger version

Name:	Tieman 73 SD Formula.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	61.2 KB
ID:	136426   Click image for larger version

Name:	Tieman Brewster SD Formula in the Dog Dish.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	75.2 KB
ID:	136427  


Last edited by 165th; 07-14-2008 at 10:55 PM.
  #29  
Old 07-14-2008, 11:17 PM
1977blackta 1977blackta is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 60
Default

Yes, GM 481776 IS still available and also GM 480200 (lower hose). I ordered both a couple weeks ago.

I think that is correct though, you will have to cut the length on the top hose. I will have to look at mine next time I am in the garage. It is at my parents house across town. Doing a major detail job.

Mine is a 77 400 W72 manual transmission.

  #30  
Old 07-15-2008, 08:20 PM
Father&Son73T/A Father&Son73T/A is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,424
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1977blackta View Post
Yes, GM 481776 IS still available and also GM 480200 (lower hose). I ordered both a couple weeks ago.

I think that is correct though, you will have to cut the length on the top hose. I will have to look at mine next time I am in the garage. It is at my parents house across town. Doing a major detail job.

Mine is a 77 400 W72 manual transmission.
Really?
Mid telling us where you bought it from,cause i called two dealers and five resto places.
All told me it was not available and discontinued.............

__________________
1973 T/A Buccaneer Red L-75 A3,83k mi. #'s match
1979 T/A Atlantis Blue W-72 WS6 23k mi.survivor#'s match
1999 T/A Navy Blue 60k mi....babied
1968 442-gone but not forgotten
"Oh,you can think about it,.....but don't do it!"
Sheriff Bufford T.Justice
  #31  
Old 07-15-2008, 09:29 PM
Norwood's Avatar
Norwood Norwood is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 6,660
Default

Duane, http://gmpartsdirect.com/ order them up....and order me belts,9433749 and 9433751 Thanks


Last edited by Norwood; 07-15-2008 at 09:49 PM.
  #32  
Old 07-15-2008, 10:45 PM
1977blackta 1977blackta is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 60
Default

I work at a GM dealer. I bought it there.

Make sure you have your number correct. I saw in an earlier post you had the number listed as "418776" instead of the correct number "481776".

Part number 418776 probably WAS discontinued in 1992 if that is the number you gave the dealer. Tell them the correct number "481776".

If you did give then the correct number, then go to another dealer because they are not being very supportive in my opinion.

Good luck to you,
-Doug

PS... likewise, as Norwood says, try GMPARTSDIRECT.com Another great source!

  #33  
Old 07-16-2008, 08:21 AM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

I've been looking over the pictures everyone has posted, and been studying the numbers associated with the yellow 76EX50 that is also marked on the hoses. There is a number after the 76EX50 that I'm convinced is a date code for manufacture of the hose.

My upper hose has: 76EX50 8M04 - December 4, 1978 (In this type of datecoding, sometimes the letter I is skipped).
My Lower hose has: 9B06 - February 6, 1979
Build date on my car is February 21, 1979

FatherandSon has 8K24 - November 24, 1978
Do you happen to know the build date of your '79TA?

Coolbird has 6K28 - November 28, 1976
Do you happen to know the build date of your '77TA?

Even Norwood's NOS hoses have codes that could be interpreted as date codes:
5L18 - November 18, 1975
5F02 - February 02, 1975

Finally, there are other letters after the datecode that I don't have an explanation for.
Thanks!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	480200NT lower hose 2.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	74.0 KB
ID:	136554  


Last edited by 165th; 07-16-2008 at 08:28 AM.
  #34  
Old 07-16-2008, 08:54 PM
1977blackta 1977blackta is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 165th View Post
Even Norwood's NOS hoses have codes that could be interpreted as date codes:
5L18 - November 18, 1975
5F02 - February 02, 1975

Finally, there are other letters after the datecode that I don't have an explanation for.
Thanks!
165th,

Wouldn't the 5F02 hose be June 02, 1975?

Just making sure I am reading correctly!

  #35  
Old 07-16-2008, 09:08 PM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

Yes Black, you got it right.

Also, the K in Fatherandson and Coolbird should be October, not November.

I think I sent that email out too early this morning!

  #36  
Old 07-16-2008, 09:51 PM
1977blackta 1977blackta is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 165th View Post
Yes Black, you got it right.

Also, the K in Fatherandson and Coolbird should be October, not November.

I think I sent that email out too early this morning!

Yes, I know how mornings can be all too well!

  #37  
Old 09-19-2008, 07:59 PM
Held for Ransom's Avatar
Held for Ransom Held for Ransom is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 9,070
Default

165th,

Father&Son73T/A was asking about this in another thread so I thought I would add info here. I believe my '74 Formula has the correct (original) upper hose (pictures posted). As you can see from this and the original 73SD hose you posted earlier, the date coding was more traditional (6 xx 3 on your picture. 9 19 3 (built 10A) on mine).
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	74FormulaUpRadHose1.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	31.0 KB
ID:	143382   Click image for larger version

Name:	74FormulaUpRadHose2.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	35.3 KB
ID:	143383  

  #38  
Old 09-19-2008, 10:39 PM
70RAlll 70RAlll is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Father&Son73T/A View Post
418776 was dicontinued by GM in 2002.
The pic of the 73 SD has a hose #489876,which is actually the hose on my 79 and is correct for a 79 W72,I confirmed this.
That's why I am curiouse about the 489876 on a 73 SD..........

..........from what I understand 480200 IS STILL AVAILABLE from GM,,,,,
I would agree with your curiosity about the yellow 489876 on the 73 Formula. I saw another restoration done by the same guy on a 1970 RA IV where he put a yellow stamping when I know without a doubt that 1970's had a white 480203top and 480201 bottom stampings. SO just because it is a nice restored rare car doesn't verify it is correct,could be.might very well be ....but I would want verification elsewhere besides just that car.like a GM book...or a verified original car. any 73 Firebird would do.. ..

  #39  
Old 09-24-2008, 10:11 PM
Father&Son73T/A Father&Son73T/A is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,424
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Held for Ransom View Post
165th,

Father&Son73T/A was asking about this in another thread so I thought I would add info here. I believe my '74 Formula has the correct (original) upper hose (pictures posted). As you can see from this and the original 73SD hose you posted earlier, the date coding was more traditional (6 xx 3 on your picture. 9 19 3 (built 10A) on mine).
THAT is VERY interesting,thank you for these pics............

__________________
1973 T/A Buccaneer Red L-75 A3,83k mi. #'s match
1979 T/A Atlantis Blue W-72 WS6 23k mi.survivor#'s match
1999 T/A Navy Blue 60k mi....babied
1968 442-gone but not forgotten
"Oh,you can think about it,.....but don't do it!"
Sheriff Bufford T.Justice
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017